By BadBoyScientist,
May 17th, 2015


This isn’t as much a diary as a few questions to start a discussion.

Supposing the TPP gets rammed through and American states, counties and cities lose some of their autonomy to the ‘Star Chamber’ of multinationals.  I suspect they won’t like it – and their constituents won’t like it.

0) Can state and local governments practice ‘civil disobedience’ to protest an unjust law?

1) Could a state use this as a basis to secede from the United States since it will be placing the State under ‘foreign rule’ with no way to petition this ‘shadow gov’t’?

2) Could a city or state just ignore the ruling of this ‘court’?  I mean, how much power does that court have?  Who enforces it?  What could they do if a state said “Try to stop us from prohibiting the sale of those products and good luck collecting your settlement from us.”   If the multinational tried to seize state or local assets it could get the citizens mobilized and national guard deployed and even provoke a civil war!   And that probably wouldn’t be good press for that company.

3) Suppose a state winds up paying billions to a multinational and publicizes how many tax dollars went into the coffers of that multinational? (Most of us hate wasting our tax dollars).  And encourages boycotts of all products from that multinational – all with plausible deniability, of course.

4) What about requiring merchants to place ‘consumer awareness’ signs prominently … like those signs: “This Product/Location has chemicals known by the State of California to cause cancer in lab animals.”   It isn’t a ban but it is making customers aware of the chemicals so they can make an informed choice.  (BTW: If that gov’t banned it – chances are more consumers there don’t want to buy it)

5) What about all of those ‘buy local’ programs supported by chambers of commerce and labor groups alike?   What about requiring imported products, American products and local products be separated on the shelves?

You probably have many more ideas than I do how state and local governments can oppose TPP for the sake of their constituents – and I look forward to reading them…

Categories: Campaign Updates

Related Posts

Campaign Updates

NAFTA vs May 17th

Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, announced that if Congress is not notified that a finalized agreement has been completed for revising NAFTA by May 17, Congress will not be able to pass any revised Read more…

Campaign Updates

No NAFTA 2.0, We Need a Full Replacement

It is time to be alert. NAFTA negotiations are happening at an intensive rate at the USTR’s headquarters in Washington D.C. and government representatives from the US, Canada, and Mexico are seeking to come out Read more…

Campaign Updates

Where Trade Meets War

Despite hearing a lot about the possibility of a ‘trade war’ with China in the news in the past months, we have heard very little about the trade that wars require. The buying and selling Read more…