By Vicki Needham in The Hill

Staff note: So it looks like the Baucus-Camp Fast Track bill is dead in the Senate. It is very likely that Wyden and Democrats such as Levin in the House will come up with a new Fast Track bill. It is important that we keep the pressure on because no Fast Track bill is acceptable. After 4 years of negotiation, nothing that is put in a Fast Track bill will make a difference. Fast Track will only allow the TPP to be signed into law without a full review of the impacts it will have on our health, safety and economy. We must continue to keep the pressure on Congress to tell them that we don’t need a new fast track. We need to start over with a new approach to trade that is inclusive, transparent and democratic

The next chairman of the Senate Finance Committee is making it plain to President Obama that he will not rush forward with “fast-track” legislation that would spur on the White House’s trade agenda.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has no plans to take up the fast-track bill written by outgoing Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), who was nominated by Obama to be U.S. ambassador to China.

Instead, he says he will hear out other senators on trade, a policy area he says has changed tremendously since the last time a fast-track bill was approved, in 2002.

“Senators want to examine the changes in global commerce and how it affects both the process and substantive agreements, so I’m going to spend some time listening to senators,” Wyden told The Hill.

Other Democrats on the Finance panel say Wyden is signaling that fast-track — which Obama called for in his State of the Union address last week — is on ice for now.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), a member of the panel who has been critical of free-trade policies, said his view is that Wyden will ditch the bill Baucus wrote with Sen. Orrin Hatch (Utah), the top Republican on Finance, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.).

Brown expects Wyden to start from scratch.

“We’re not going to pass a 2002 fast-track and that’s pretty much what the Hatch-Camp-Baucus bill was,” he told The Hill. “It was dressing up the pig to make it look a little better … but nothing more than that.

“It has to be fundamentally different,” Brown said of a future bill.

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), another Finance member, cited concerns in the Democratic Caucus and said he expects Wyden will “take a new look” at the authority. Cardin wants U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman to testify before the committee and address Democratic concerns.

Obama’s hopes for fast-track already looked to be in trouble, given Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) dismissal of quick action last week.

But the comments from Wyden, Brown and Cardin are a second blow for an issue that has been championed by business groups and could serve as a rare opportunity for compromise between Obama and congressional Republicans.

Hatch warned that the White House’s ambitious trade agenda would likely collapse without fast-track — also known as trade promotion authority (TPA) — which makes it easier to negotiate trade deals by preventing them from being amended and installing time limits on congressional consideration.

“We’re not going to make any of these trade agreements without TPA and the other countries know that,” Hatch said.

The administration is now negotiating deals with the European Union and a group of Latin American and Pacific nations known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a deal seen as a key part of the administration’s “pivot” to Asia.

“They know it’s dead on arrival unless we can have TPA passed,” Hatch said of trading partners. “Frankly, Chairman Camp, Chairman Baucus and myself worked long and hard to come up with what he have, it’s a fair and reasonable approach.”

He said he hoped Wyden would “support the president” and move the Baucus measure.

“We shouldn’t have to change it. It’s a bipartisan bill that was really worked out over a long period of time and we shouldn’t really try to change it,” he said.

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Wednesday suggested Republicans could move a bill through the House but that it would be a dead letter unless Obama can convince Democratic senators to support it.

“Unfortunately, like many of our jobs bills, his party’s leaders in the Senate are standing in the way,” Boehner said in comments on the House floor. “The president needs to use his bully pulpit only as the president can, and change their minds.”

To win Democratic support, it’s likely the Baucus-Hatch legislation will have to be changed to give Congress a bigger voice in trade negotiations. Rep. Sandy Levin (Mich.), a leading Democratic voice on trade whose views carry weight in both chambers, has also called for specific language addressing currency manipulation — a particular worry with some countries in the TPP.

On currency manipulation, Levin has suggested a framework must be developed that would include penalties for countries that manipulate currencies to lower the value of their exports.

Wyden has touted the benefits of trade to the nation’s economic growth, and is not seen as a hard-core opponent of free-trade agreements.

But he’s made it clear he will not move quickly and wants to hear from his colleagues.

“I’m going to listen to how senators would like to proceed,” he told The Hill. “They want to weigh in, they feel strongly about transparency, state-owned enterprises and currency manipulation, I want to give them a chance to weigh in.”

Categories: Campaign Updates

Related Posts

Campaign Updates

NAFTA vs May 17th

Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, announced that if Congress is not notified that a finalized agreement has been completed for revising NAFTA by May 17, Congress will not be able to pass any revised Read more…

Campaign Updates

No NAFTA 2.0, We Need a Full Replacement

It is time to be alert. NAFTA negotiations are happening at an intensive rate at the USTR’s headquarters in Washington D.C. and government representatives from the US, Canada, and Mexico are seeking to come out Read more…

Campaign Updates

Where Trade Meets War

Despite hearing a lot about the possibility of a ‘trade war’ with China in the news in the past months, we have heard very little about the trade that wars require. The buying and selling Read more…