By Jillian Harding for Reuters

Don’t pop the champagne cork just yet for the EU-Canada trade deal. Sure, policymakers are touting the deal as a boon to their national economies. But there are still more hurdles to clear, including approval by EU member governments.  That won’t be easy, because protesters the deal will crimp wages and eliminate jobs.

The deal removes tariffs, expands existing agreements on goods, and updates regulations on services. All of this means big changes in each country’s economy.  There will be winners and losers, but what policymakers are after is a net benefit. Once the deal is done, citizens overall should be better off with the agreement, the deal’s proponents say.

A study by the EU & Canada projected a deal would result in a total household income gain of at least “8.4 billion euros for Canada, and 10.5 billion euros for the EU.” “These figures do not take into account less-readily-quantifiable areas that provide additional potential for gains,” the study said. So we should expect even more great things, right?

Not so fast. A recent Tufts University study says Canadian and European workers’ income will take a hit as gains from trade are unlikely to make it into their pockets.  The authors say the model used by a variety of EU/Canada trade studies assumes full employment and neutral income distribution and therefore does not paint a full picture.


SOURCE: CETA Without Blinders: Kohler/Storm

According to the Tufts study, “By 2023…workers will have foregone average annual earnings of 1,776 euros in Canada and between 316 euros and 1,331 euros in the EU, depending on the country. Aggregate demand shortfalls nurtured by heightened unemployment will also hurt productivity and cause cumulative welfare losses amounting to 0.96 percent and 0.49 percent of national income in Canada and the EU, respectively.”

Labor’s share of the economy has declined as globalization and technology has enabled firms to produce more goods in more places, reducing workers’ bargaining power and lowering wages.  If the second study is correct, it would be yet another blow to an already frustrated class of citizens.

Related Posts

Campaign Updates

NAFTA vs May 17th

Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, announced that if Congress is not notified that a finalized agreement has been completed for revising NAFTA by May 17, Congress will not be able to pass any revised Read more…

Campaign Updates

No NAFTA 2.0, We Need a Full Replacement

It is time to be alert. NAFTA negotiations are happening at an intensive rate at the USTR’s headquarters in Washington D.C. and government representatives from the US, Canada, and Mexico are seeking to come out Read more…

Campaign Updates

Where Trade Meets War

Despite hearing a lot about the possibility of a ‘trade war’ with China in the news in the past months, we have heard very little about the trade that wars require. The buying and selling Read more…